ČAMINSKI logoČAMINSKIEngineering Advisory & Project Delivery
ENGINEERING INSIGHTS / GUIDE 02

FAT vs SAT: what industrial teams must prove

Distinguish factory proof from site readiness and avoid turning acceptance into an improvised checklist.

FAT — prove the configured system

Test the specified functions at the supplier or integrator site using controlled conditions. Agree on what can realistically be simulated and record deviations.

SAT — prove operation at the customer site

Retest relevant functions with real traffic, wireless infrastructure, doors, control integrations and operators under agreed conditions.

Use traceability rather than generic checks

Link each test step to one requirement, acceptance criterion, owner, evidence artifact and pass/fail decision.

Handle exceptions explicitly

Separate blockers from minor defects, assign owners, establish retest criteria and document the conditions for provisional acceptance.

Operational handover is a separate gate

Confirm training, service access, spare-part information, recovery instructions, software versions, backups and support escalation.

Acceptance is not a ceremonial signature. It is documented evidence that the agreed system works in its intended environment.
← Engineering Insights Library